|
Farmers, in turn, make decisions in planting, managing,
harvesting and processing their crops that affect the genetic diversity of the crop populations. Over time a farmer may modify the
genetic structure of a population by selecting for plants with
preferred agromorphological characteristics. He or she may influence
the survival of certain genotypes by choosing a particular farm
management practice or by planting a crop population in a site with
a particular micro-environment. Farmers make decisions on how much
of each crop variety to plant each year, the percentage of seed or
germplasm to save from their own stock and the percentage to buy or
exchange from other sources. Each of these decisions, which can
affect the genetic diversity of cultivars, is linked to a complex
set of environmental and socioeconomic influences on the farmer.
Maintaining crop genetic diversity
There are growing pressures on small farmers
who maintain significant amounts of crop genetic diversity in the
form of local cultivars. Increased population, poverty, land
degradation, environmental change and the introduction of modern
crop varieties have contributed to the erosion of genetic resources
in crops. In recent decades, agricultural scientists have responded
to the threat of genetic erosion by developing a worldwide network
of genebanks and botanical gardens for conserving the available
useful genetic resources ex
situ. While this has been the main strategy against the
loss of genetic diversity
in our crops, facilities are unlikely to accommodate the full range
of useful diversity in economically useful plant species. In
addition, these facilities do not conserve the dynamic processes of
crop evolution and farmer’s knowledge of crop selection,
management and maintenance inherent in the development of local
cultivars. Nor can they ensure the continued access and use of these
resources by farmers.
|
In situ conservation has the
potential to (1) conserve the processes of evolution and
adaptation of crops to their environments, (2) conserve
diversity at all levels – the ecosystem, the species and the
genetic diversity within species, (3) improve the
livelihood for resource-poor farmers, (4) maintain or
increase control and access of
farmers over their genetic resources, and (5) integrate farmers into
the national plant genetic resources system for conservation.
|
 |
|
Crop diversity in agricultural
systems, in addition to being affected by population structure
and natural selection from the surrounding environment, is
affected by human selection of agrmorphological
characteristics.
|
Diversity for use and development
The
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) is
committed to advancing the conservation and use of plant genetic
resources for the benefit of current and future generations.
Effective management and conservation of genetic resources on-farm
takes place where the resources are valued and used to meet the
needs of local communities and contribute to development. In order
to be maintained by farmers, genetic resources must be:
-
competitive with other options a farmer
might have, and
-
contribute to the security and possible
increase in a farmer’s income.
 |
Value may be added to crop resources in
two main ways: (1) the material itself may be improved or (2)
the demand for the material or some derived product may be
increased. The first option is to seek improved quality,
disease resistance, yield, taste or other preferred
characteristics, through participatory plant
breeding.
|
|
Human selection and management
also include choices on what farming management practice to
use, and where or in which micro-environment to plant.
These management practices in turn will affect the genetic structure
of the local cultivar.
|
The second option includes adding value to crop resources by better
processing, storage and marketing, to increase the value
and benefit that farmers receive from the use of the genetic
resources.
Community-based organizations, extension workers and NGOs who
work closely with farmers have an important role to play in
identifying and adding value to farmer-managed genetic resources.
Such organizations can also recommend strategies which support
farmer management practices that increase the amount of genetic
diversity and identify counterincentives to the use of diversity,
e.g. policies and market constraints. Community-based organizations
and NGOs also assist the formation of farmer cooperatives and
community seed banks to maximize returns to the farmers themselves.
IPGRI and national partners: the
development of a global project
IPGRI’s mission is to encourage,
support and engage in activities to strengthen the conservation and
use of plant genetic resources with special emphasis on developing
countries. IPGRI works in partnerships with national programmes to
undertake research and training, and provides scientific and
technical advice and information.
A major challenge for in situ
conservation is the development of the knowledge needed in national
programmes to determine where, when and how in situ conservation
will be effective. In response to this challenge, IPGRI,
together with National Partners in nine countries, formulated
a global project to strengthen the scientific basis of in situ
conservation of agricultural biodiversity. The nine countries
involved in the project are Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Hungary, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, Peru, Turkey and Vietnam. These
nine partner countries were included because each was within a region of primary diversity for
crop genetic resources with worldwide importance. Each has
traditional farming communities which maintain plant genetic
resources. The countries all have national programmes organized to
conserve crop resources, which
|
include ex situ conservation
facilities, and all indicate a strong interest in developing a
national capacity to support in situ conservation. In
each country, strengthening the relations of formal
institutions with farmers and local-level institutions to
promote on-farm conservation is a major concern.
Major objectives, hypotheses and preliminary activities for the
project were decided upon by IPGRI and National Partners at the
First Participants Meeting held in Rome in
July 1995.
|
 |
|
|
Farmer decision-making can also
affect the population structure of the local cultivar
population in the farmer's field. Farmers make decisions
on the size of the population to plant (field size), the
distance between population/fields, the amount of seeds to save
from their own crop or to use from other farmers (migration)
and the breeding system to use. These decisions affect
the genetic diversity of the cultivars.
|
|
The three main
objectives of the project are:
-
to support the development of a framework
of knowledge on farmer decision-making processes that influence
in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity,
-
to strengthen national institutions for
the planning and implementation of conservation programmes for
agricultural biodiversity
-
to broaden the use of agricultural
biodiversity and the participation in its conservation by
farming communities and other groups.
To achieve these objectives, three main strategies were agreed
upon:
(1) multidisciplinary work in the areas of population genetics,
ecology, agronomy and social sciences carried out by
multi-institutional teams from formal institutions and
community-based organizations,
(2) community participatory breeding and agronomic work,
including community and locally based conservation activities
involving market development, non-market incentives, and
community-based training that will support sustainable agriculture,
and
(3) international coordination and scientific synthesis to create
a global framework for supporting in situ conservation by
farmers.
As a result of the 1995 meeting, the national partners formulated
the following key research questions:
(1) to determine and understand the situations in which local
cultivars are maintained by farmers,
(2) to identify the key factors which affect farmer decisions to
maintain local cultivars,
(3) to understand how farmer decision-making affects the amount
of genetic variation within crop populations over time, and
(4) to find ways to assist the continued selection of local
cultivars or cultivars that conserve local germplasm.
In 1997, national partners, technical experts and IPGRI staff met
to discuss and agree on information needed and methodologies to be
used to understand the effects of farmer decision-making,
agro-ecosystems and population structure and breeding systems on the
genetic diversity of local cultivar population over time. The
participants decided to collect and analyze information, data and
farmer perceptions by gender, age and ethnic group in six main
areas:
-
socioeconomic, cultural and biological
influences on farmer
decision-making
-
farmer selection of agromorphological characters
-
population
structure of local cultivars, including population size,
isolation and geneflow between and within cultivars and crop wild relatives
-
environmental selection by agro-ecosystems,
including natural factors (e.g. soil, precipitation,
temperature, disease, etc.) and managed factors (fertilizer
application, irrigation, weeding, harvesting practices, etc.)
-
seed/germplasm
supply systems, and
-
adding value through participatory plant breeding,
market, non-market and consumer incentives and agricultural
policy
 |
|
|
Crop diversity in agricultural
systems is influenced by the natural and human-managed
environment, by the population structure and the management
of this structure by farmers, and by the selection of
agromorphological characteristics of the cultivar. |
The basic sampling units decided for the above six areas are the
farmer’s household, the farmers’ named crop variety, the farmers’
field and the farmers’ seed sample. These units will then be
aggregated from household to village to community, from named crop
variety of one farmer to the populations of the named variety in a
village, and to populations of the variety across the
landscape.
Within the global project the partners emphasize the
representation of gender, age and ethnic groups at all levels, from
decision-making to data collecting. The project strategy is
participatory and relies on learning approaches rather than the
development of specific models. The concern is to understand what is
happening rather than to prescribe abstract solutions.
Finally, the in situ conservation project is not aimed at
dissuading farmers from adopting new crop varieties that are more
productive and increase incomes. Rather, the project will contribute
to a better understanding and appreciation of, and add value to the
locally developed genetic resources maintained by farmers and will
help to integrate on-farm conservation practices into the national
PGR system.
Factors
affecting on-farm genetic
diversity of crop
genepools
|
|
|
|
Outputs
expected for the project: |
|
-
Measures of
the extent and distribution of the genetic diversity of
selected crops over space and time
-
A data set
linking farmer decision-making on the selection and
maintenance of local cultivars with measurable indices of
genetic diversity
-
Identification
of key or limiting factors (environmental, biological,
cultural and socioeconomic)
-
Descriptions
of farmers' access and use of formal and informal seed
supply systems
-
Key
indicators and measurements of the effect of increasing
population pressures, land degradation and environmental
change on the maintenance of on-farm diversity
-
Information
on the effect of market development (access to market,
off-farm income, availability of credit to male and female
farmers) on the maintenance of on-farm diversity
|
-
Recommendations
for national economic and agricultural policy to aid the
maintenance of on-farm diversity
-
Trained male
and female personnel in short courses in plant population
genetics and ecology, biogeography, conservation biology,
economics and anthropology
-
Linked
biological and social science programmes in institutes and
universities
-
Guidelines
for research and practice in in situ conservation
-
Standardized
terms/ definitions and common research protocols for in
situ conservation for the nine participating countries
-
Gender
awareness incorporated in national in situ conservation
programmes
-
Increased
number of women in management and decision-making roles
and in training courses
|
-
Communication
networks between participating countries
-
Decentralized
breeding and selection techniques that enhance or maintain
on-farm genetic diversity
-
Improved
local cultivars combing substantial genetic diversity with
enhanced performance
-
Male and
female farmers and project personnel trained in
decentralized breeding
-
Strengthened
community institutions for biodiversity management
-
Improved
links between formal and informal institutions and farmers
-
Gender
awareness incorporated in community and locally based in
situ conservation programmes
-
Information
bases, for farmer use, on the characteristics and value of
local varieties
|
|
Contact h.klemick@cgiar.org
about
this page
|