|
Norway spruce genetic
resources in Norway and their management and conservation
Tore Skrøppa
Norwegian Forest Research
Institute, 1432 Ås, Norway
Introduction
Norway spruce (Picea abies)
is a young species in Norway. After the ice age, birch, poplar and
Scots pine were the first tree species to establish. During the warm
and dry period that followed, high-temperature demanding species
such as lime, beech, oak, ash and hazel spread, and the timber line
was 200-300 m higher than at present. It was not until approximately
2500 years ago, during a cooler and more humid period, that spruce
started its introduction into the Norwegian landscape. The Nordic
spruce populations have their origin in the taiga in northern Russia
and Siberia. During a period of 3000 years the species spread
through Finland and northern Sweden. The earliest identified
establishments are from the years 500-400 BC in the border areas
close to Sweden in Central Norway (Hafsten 1991, 1992). The invasion
of the southeastern lowland area took place during the following
1000 years, but the migration up the valleys to the species' present
altitudinal boundary was not completed until the period 1000-1500
AD. The coastal spruce forest in Central Norway was established
rather late (approximately 1300 AD). The species never established
naturally in western Norway, except for a few scattered populations,
which have a late establishment and most likely are spread from the
nearest source stands east of the mountain range (Hafsten 1991).
The present natural occurrence
of Norway spruce is in southeastern Norway from sea level and up to
1000 m, and in Central and North Norway, north to lat. 67EN, at
decreasing altitudes in the north. Outside this area the species has
in this century been planted both in western Norway and north of its
natural boundary in northern Norway. In both regions it has become
an important timber species.
The Norway spruce forests have
been strongly influenced by human activities. An excessive harvest
started more than 300-400 years ago and strongly depleted the forest
resources in some regions. At the beginning of this century the
annual harvest in Norwegian forests exceeded annual growth, while
the harvest is at present only around 50% of the gross annual
production.
Norway spruce is the most
important species in Norwegian forestry. The total forest area is 12
million hectares or 37% of the total land area. Productive forests
cover 23% of the land area (7 million hectares), half of which is
spruce forest. More than one-third of the forest is older than 80
years. The total annual harvest is 10 million m3, of
which spruce amounts to 70%.
Legal framework
Norway has no laws or
regulations specifically dealing with the conservation of the forest
genetic resources. The Norwegian Forestry Act, however, provides
general measures for the long-term preservation and sustainable
utilization of the forests, which also relate to management of the
genetic resources. Special recommendations are given for forestry
activities in areas which have such location, conditions or
characteristics that they should be managed with particular care.
Where restrictions are deemed necessary, such areas may be
classified as protection forest and be subject to regulations.
Protection forests comprise approximately 20% of Norway's total
forest area and are in particular located at high elevations, along
coasts or in the far north. The Forestry Act is administered by the
Ministry of Agriculture.
The maintenance of genetic
diversity is one of the main motives in the regulations for the
classification, trade and use of reproductive materials in forestry.
Specific recommendations are given for the transfer of provenances
and use of vegatatively propagated materials. Seed from native
Norway spruce stands should not be transferred more than 200 km in
the northern or southern direction. Vertically, transfers should be
within the range of 300 m. Close to the altitudinal and boreal
timber line only local provenances should be used. Seeds from Norway
spruce seed orchards should be tested for growth rhythm and frost
hardiness, which should determine their regional use.
Two other components of
Norwegian legislation, administered by the Ministry of Environment,
have importance in the management of the forest genetic resources.
These are the Building and Planning Act and the Nature Conservation
Act. The first one provides fundamental principles for land
management limiting nonforestry development and urban expansion on
forest land. The Nature Conservation Act provides for the
classification of specific areas which are to be protected as
national parks, nature reserves, landscape protection areas and
natural monuments. Opportunity is given, moreover, for combining
species protection and the conservation of areas in the form of what
is called habitat preservation.
Threats to spruce genetic
resources and public awareness
The Norway spruce genetic
resources are not considered to be threatened in any part of its
native range in Norway. Large areas of old-growth natural stands
still exist, even if their abundance has been reduced, in particular
in the lowlands in southeastern Norway. New forests are being
established by natural regeneration over large areas and this method
has gained importance during the last few years. Under certain
ecological conditions, however, natural regeneration will not be
sufficient for the establishment of a well-stocked Norway spruce
stand, and planting is necessary.
Owing to a lack of Norway
spruce seeds of local origin, seedlings of Central European
provenances were planted in southeastern Norway during a 20-year
period starting in the mid-1950s. In one county, Østfold, 35% of
the total number of seedlings planted in the period 1960-1980
originated from provenances in Austria and in Schwarzwald, Germany.
It was thought that the high altitude of the seed stands, between
800 and 1400 m, would compensate for the southern latitude. However,
both practical observations and a recent survey in planted stands (Skrøppa
et al. 1993) have shown that these stands are not well
adapted to the northern climatic conditions. While 30% of the trees
in 30-year-old planted stands of native origins were classified as
having saw timber qualities, only 7% of the trees in the Central
European stands obtained the same classification. These provenance
transfers had a negative effect on timber quality, particuarly on
sites where frosts commonly occur in late spring or early autumn.
The stands established with seedlings from introduced provenances
are in many cases mixed with stands of local seed origin and are
often not recognizable. The seeds harvested in such areas, even in
healthy stands, may be partly from local and partly from provenance
hybrid crosses. Critical factors are the abundance of flowering in
the stands of introduced provenances, the range of pollen migration
and how fast the natural selection process proceeds.
Transfers of Norway spruce
provenances from southern to northern latitudes and from low to high
altitudes also have been made within Norway. Such transfers have in
some cases resulted in plantations that show lack of adapation to
the climatic conditions. However, as these plantations in many cases
have failed and are rather scattered, they will in a few cases
produce pollen or seeds in large enough quantities to have a
practical consequences, either for natural regeneration or for seed
collections.
The concept of genetic
diversity of forest trees has not been an important topic in public
discussions in Norway. The introduction of Central European Norway
spruce provenances has been criticized, but on grounds of the
reduced timber quality in the planted stands and not so much because
of a possible threat to the local spruce genetic resources. The
introduction of spruce and its replacement of Scots pine and
deciduous tree stands in western and northern Norway outside its
natural range are debated locally. The negative voices are based
partly on ecological considerations from naturalist groups as well
as a general reluctance to accept changes in the landscape.
Public awareness of forest
genetic resources and the considerations of their importance for the
future forests are generally missing.
Conservation activities
The forest tree genetic
resources have generally been managed through the reforestation
strategies employed after harvesting. Natural regeneration is
encouraged where it is a feasible and optimal regeneration method.
Thirty-five years ago the annual volume of forest tree seedlings
planted exceeded 100 million. This number has been drastically
reduced, and in the last 10-year period 50-55 million spruce
seedlings have been planted annually. During the last 5-year period
there has been a reduction in the number of seedlings planted.
The gene conservation
activities of forest trees in Norway are accomplished in three
different ways: by nature conservation areas in national parks,
protected landscape areas or nature reserves; by recently
established conservation areas in productive coniferous forests, and
by materials preserved in clonal archives or seed orchards as part
of the tree breeding program.
The conservation of forest
genetic resources has not been a motive for the establishment of
nature conservation areas. Most national parks and nature reserves
are located far north and at high altitudes and do not sample
representative areas of the Norwegian coniferous forest. In total 20
000 ha of coniferous forest are conserved in these areas. They
cannot be considered to play a major role in the conservation of the
Norway spruce genetic resources.
Based on a national plan to
conserve coniferous forest, altogether 25 000 ha of productive
forest have been protected. Norway spruce is the main species in the
larger part of these areas. The main intention was conservation of
biological diversity in general, but conservation of the genetic
resources also was a motive. These areas are distributed in
different parts of the country and are stratified to be
representative for all major ecological zones. The different areas
vary in size, from 10 to several thousand hectares.
The more active gene
conservation work is performed by the establishment of clonal
archives or seed orchards of grafted Norway spruce clones.
Selections of plus trees have been made in natural stands covering
the entire distribution throughout the country to be included in
breeding populations. More than 3000 selected trees have been
grafted, most of these at several localities. They were grouped in
breeding populations according to the latitude and altitude of the
origin of the natural stand. However, it was soon realized that
progeny tests are necessary to assess the genetic value of a
selected plus tree, and more than 2000 of the selected trees have
been tested by family tests planted in trials at several sites.
Traits that have been measured include height and diameter growth,
annual growth rhythm characteristics, climatic damage and stem and
branch quality. In addition, a large number of families have been
tested in artificial freezing experiments.
The grafted clones and their
offspring in progeny tests are an important part of the gene
conservation activities, as they are the only materials from which
specific genetic information is available.
Genetic variation in Norway
spruce
So far, no studies of isozyme
or DNA genetic markers have been performed to characterize the
genetic variability of the Norwegian spruce population. The genetic
information available comes from quantitative genetic studies in
provenance trials and family and clonal tests. The largest efforts
have been made to characterize adaptation to the climatic
conditions. Therefore measurements have in particular been made of
annual growth rhythm traits: the timing and duration of the annual
growth period, frost hardiness development in the autumn and
dehardening in the spring, and the occurrence of climatic damage
under field conditions. All studies demonstrate a clinal variation
in growth rhythm characteristics of natural populations from the
south to the north and from low to high altitudes. The southern and
low altitude populations have the longest duration of the growth
season, and, as a consequence, the highest growth potential. They
also have the latest development of autumn frost hardiness. The only
well-known characterizations of the adaptative process of spruce
populations are the responses to temperature and photoperiod.
The genetic variation is large
within all natural populations studied, also for traits that shown
clinal variation at the provenance level. Genetic correlations
between traits may change dramatically, depending on the genetic
level, whether it be based on population, family or clonal means.
Research activities
The general intentions with
the genetic research in Norway spruce are: to describe and
understand the genetic variability of the species, to develop
strategies for breeding for better quality in well-adapted,
high-yielding plantations, and to assure that sufficient genetic
variability is conserved for the future evolution of the species.
At present the main research
interest is focused on the genetic mechanisms behind the variability
observed in phenotypic traits having importance for adaptation to
the climatic conditions. Based on experimental evidence, our
hypothesis is that genetic variation in such traits is not only
regulated by classical (Mendelian) gene frequency differences, but
also by other mechanisms (e.g. gene regulations), and that these
factors are triggered by environmental influences during the
generative reproductive process. If this is the case, then it will
have large implications both for understanding the evolutionary
process and for the conservation of the genetic resources of the
species.
These effects were brought
into focus by the location of seed orchards in warmer climates. The
seedlings produced in Norway spruce seed orchards in Norway where
the parental clones are transferred to seed orchard sites 6-8
degrees of latitude southwards or to 500-600 m lower in altitude, do
not retain the annual growth rhythm of their parents, see Johnsen
(1989a,b) and Skrøppa and Johnsen (1994). Progenies after
controlled crosses in such orchards, as well as the open-pollinated
orchard offspring, have in particular a later growth start in the
spring, a delayed growth cessation and a later development of autumn
frost hardiness than their sibs born in their native environment.
The effects have been shown in freezing tests of 1- or 2-year-old
seedlings, but are verified by growth rhythm studies in experiments
with 10-year-old trees (Skrøppa 1994) and after clonal propagation
(Johnsen 1989a). The population mean of seed orchard offspring is
changed, but the genetic variation between different families for
the traits seems to be retained. The environmental influences during
the reproductive process have been verified by making identical
crosses in a greenhouse and in a nearby seed orchard (Johnsen et
al. 1995), and early and late in the spring in a heated
greenhouse and outside the greenhouse (Johnsen and Skrøppa,
unpublished).
Results from field trials and
in practical plantings indicate that the observed effects may have
practical consequences under extreme climatic situations in the
field (Skrøppa, unpublished). The effects may either be positive or
negative for the survival and quality of the plantation, depending
on how the climatic extremes are related to the annual growth rhythm
of the material. The situation seems to be similar to that of a
provenance transfer. It will be advantageous under certain
environmental conditions, but the opposite under other conditions.
Concluding comments
Norway spruce is a young
species in Norway and shows large flexibility to a wide range of
environmental conditions. Its genetic resources are not considered
to be threatened, both because of the existence of old-growth
natural stands and the extensive use of natural regeneration. When
new stands are established by planting, seeds are transferred over
rather short distances or are of local origin. An extended use of
seed-orchard seed in the future may change the genetic composition
of the planted stands. As long as the seed orchards contain a
relatively large number of parents, this should not be considered a
threat to the genetic resources. However, a combined strategy for
the long-term breeding and gene resource conservation should be
developed. An understanding of the genetic mechanisms behind the
environmental influence during reproduction on the adaptive
properties of the offspring will be of fundamental importance for
both the breeding and conservation activities.
References
Hafsten, U. 1991.
Granskogens historie in Norge under opprulling [The history of
spruce forest in Norway under exposure]. Blyttia 49:171-181.
Hafsten, U. 1992.
Granskogens innvandring og spredning i Norge [Immigration and spread
of spruce forest in Norway]. Norsk skogbruksmuseum, Årbok Nr. 13
1990-92:9-27.
Johnsen, Ø. 1989a.
Phenotypic changes in progenies of northern clones of Picea abies
(L.) Karst. grown in a southern seed orchard. I. Frost hardiness in
a phytotron experiment. Scand. J. Forest Research 4:317-330.
Johnsen, Ø. 1989b.
Phenotypic changes in progenies of northern clones of Picea abies
(L.) Karst. grown in a southern seed orchard. II. Seasonal growth
rhythm and height in field trials. Scand. J. Forest Research
4:331-341.
Johnsen, Ø., T.
Skrøppa, G. Haug, I. Apeland and G. Østreng. 1995. Sexual
reproduction in a greenhouse reduced autumn frost hardiness of Picea
abies progenies. Tree Physiol. (in press).
Skrøppa, T. 1994.
Growth rhythm and hardiness of Picea abies progenies of high
altitude parents from seed produced at low elevations. Silvae
Genetica 43:95-100.
Skrøppa, T., D.R.
Martinsen and A. Følstad. 1993. Vekst og kvalitet av
mellomeuropeiske og norske granprovenienser plantet i Østfold.
[Summary: Growth and quality of Central European and native Norway
spruce provenances planted in Østfold]. Research Paper of SKOGFORSK
7/93.
Skrøppa, T. and Ø.
Johnsen. 1994. The genetic response of plant populations to a
changing environment. Pp. 183-199 in NATO ANSI Series, Vol.
I20. Biodiversity, Temperate Ecosystems, and Global Change (T.J.B.
Boyle and C.E.B. Boyle, eds.). Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Contact EUFORGEN
Secretariat about this page
|