|
Conservation of genetic resources of
Norway spruce in Switzerland
Patrick Bonfils and Christoph
Sperisen
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and
Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Introduction
Norway spruce is the most
abundant tree species in Switzerland. The total forest area of the
country covers 1.2 million hectares and Norway spruce constitutes
49% of the total growing stock (Brändli 1996). The species fulfills
important protective, social and economic functions. Its stands help
to prevent avalanches, erosion and landslides, reduce the risk of
flooding and block rock falls. Many stands are recreational areas
and contribute to the scenic beauty of the cultural landscape. The
annual harvest of Norway spruce is approximately 2.3 million m3.
Norway spruce as a species is
not considered to be threatened in Switzerland. Norway spruce
stands, however, were largely affected by extensive exploitation in
the past (Leibundgut 1986) and human impact continues mainly by
environmental pollution. This and the predicted climate change are
likely to have negative effects on genetic variation of the stands.
To maintain the ability of stands to adapt to a changing
environment, preservation of a broad genetic variation is an
important factor for maintaining their stability (Müller-Starck et
al. 1995). Here we report on the activities performed in
Switzerland to conserve genetic variation of Norway spruce.
Distribution, occurrence and origin of Norway
spruce in Switzerland
Norway spruce is common and
widespread in most parts of Switzerland (Table 1). The main range of
the species is in the Alps, the Pre-Alps and the western Jura. It is
less frequent in the southern Alps and the remaining Jura and is
rare in the southern and western parts of the Tessin. Norway spruce
is the predominant forest tree in the upper montane and the lower
subalpine vegetation zones (Brändli 1996). In the lower subalpine
vegetation zone it represents 75% of the total growing stock. In
this zone Norway spruce often grows in pure stands whereas in the
upper montane vegetation zone it is associated with silver fir and
beech. Norway spruce stands are found at elevations of up to 2000 m
whereas small groups of trees are encountered up to 2200 m (Leibundgut
1984).
Distributions of fossil pollen
indicate that Norway spruce in Switzerland is derived from the
glacial refugium in southeast Europe (Huntley and Birks 1983).
Norway spruce colonized the country in the east and southeast some
8000 years ago and expanded to the valleys of the Alps within 3500
years (C. Burga, unpublished). The expansion in the region north of
the Alps was much slower and took more than 6000 years because of
competition with beech, oak and silver fir. Recent results from
pollen analyses indicate that Norway spruce in the Jura immigrated
from west either from relic populations in France or following an
east-west route to Savoy and then westwards to the Jura (C. Burga,
in preparation).
In the past, forest stands in
Switzerland were largely affected by human activities. Destruction
of stands started in Roman times and continued in the Middle Ages by
cuttings for timber and creation of pasture land. In the late Middle
Ages extensive cutting was done to obtain timber for construction,
firewood, salt works and ore mining. In the Alps more than
two-thirds of the subalpine forest stands were eliminated (Leibundgut
1986).
Table 1. Percentage of
the total growing stock of tree species in different regions of
Switzerland
|
Species |
Jura |
Central Plateau |
Pre-Alps |
Alps |
Southern Alps |
Switzerland |
|
Picea abies |
31.2 |
42.9 |
57.3 |
62.6 |
35.2 |
49.1 |
|
Abies alba |
21.4 |
15.4 |
22.0 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
14.9 |
|
Pinus sylvestris |
3.9 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
5.4 |
1.4 |
3.7 |
|
Larix decidua |
0.4 |
1.2 |
0.4 |
13.0 |
15.2 |
4.9 |
|
Pinus cembra |
– |
– |
– |
1.9 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
|
Other conifers |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
Fagus sylvatica |
30.0 |
20.4 |
13.3 |
6.6 |
13.1 |
16.2 |
|
Acer sp. |
3.4 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
2.1 |
|
Fraxinus sp. |
3.1 |
4.7 |
2.1 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
|
Quercus sp. |
3.3 |
4.6 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
3.0 |
2.1 |
|
Castanea sativa |
– |
– |
– |
0.1 |
14.3 |
0.9 |
|
Other broadleaves |
3.1 |
2.8 |
1.1 |
2.0 |
9.8 |
2.7 |
|
Total in 1000 m3 |
63 574 |
92 785 |
88 139 |
97 481 |
23 148 |
365 128 |
Source: Bachofen et al. 1988.
Destruction of stands caused
an increase in erosion, avalanches and flooding. Following extensive
flooding in 1865, the first federal forest legislation was
established in 1876. The law forbade clear-cutting in the Alps. This
and the import of coal reduced the pressure on the forest stands.
The devastated Norway spruce stands recovered naturally or were
regenerated by planting or sowing. The material used for plantations
was often not of local origin and imported from foreign countries
(for example Müller 1990). In addition, plantations were
established outside the natural range of Norway spruce.
The present forest law forbids
clear-cutting in the whole country and protects forests as
ecosystems close to nature. Particularly in the montane and
subalpine vegetation zones, silviculture aims at maintaining natural
stands. This is achieved by promoting natural regeneration and using
natural growth patterns to obtain uneven-aged and well-structured
stands.
Conservation aims
Extensive exploitation of
Norway spruce stands in the past may have eliminated many local
races. In addition, fragmentation and decreased size of populations
may have affected genetic processes and thus genetic variation. At
present, genetic variation may be influenced mainly by environmental
pollution. There is growing evidence that environmental pollution
causes changes in patterns of genetic variation (Scholz and Bergmann
1994).
The ability of populations to
survive and reproduce in a changing environment largely relies on
their genetic variation (Müller-Starck 1995a). The supply of
genetic variation determines the potential of populations to
generate new variation and thus to adapt to a changing environment.
Conservation of as much genetic variation as possible is therefore
an important factor for maintaining stable forest stands.
In Switzerland, a programme
was initiated in 1987 aiming at the conservation of genetic
variation of Norway spruce, silver fir and oak and it is foreseen to
include rare and endangered species (OKOK Genreservate 1988). The
partners of this programme are the Swiss Forest Agency, the Swiss
Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research and the
Swiss Forest Service. Because Norway spruce is common and widespread
in the country and natural stands are still present, the programme
aims at maintaining genetic variation in situ in gene
reserves. Ex situ conservation measures are not
envisaged at present.
Current status of research activities
Efficient conservation of
forest genetic resources largely depends on information on patterns
of genetic variation in natural populations. Strong differentiation
of a population from other populations may indicate its adaptive
specialization or its distinct origin. On the other hand, a
population revealing low differentiation from the remaining
populations may well represent the species (Gregorius 1985). Such
information is valuable for selecting populations for establishing
gene reserves.
As a basis for establishing
gene reserves, natural Norway spruce populations were investigated
by isozyme gene markers. A total of 20 populations located in the
montane and subalpine vegetation zones were investigated (Fig. 1) (Müller-Starck
1995b). For each of these populations, multilocus genotypes were
identified at 18 loci from 100 trees. The results obtained revealed
large genetic variation within populations in contrast to relatively
small variation between populations. The variation observed was not
smaller than in populations located at lower elevations in Germany
and Italy (for references see Müller-Starck 1995b).
The populations investigated
showed substantial differences in heterozygosity, number of alleles
per locus and hypothetical gametic multilocus diversity. This latter
measure is suggested to quantify the ability of populations to
create genetic variation and thus to adapt to a changing environment
(Gregorius et al. 1986). The highest level was found in a
population of the Jura (no. 1). Additional high levels were observed
in three populations distributed over the entire country (nos. 3,
14, 16) (Fig. 2).
Genetic variation observed
between populations revealed evidence that populations in the west
of the country (nos. 1, 2, 3) and also from regions in the southeast
(nos. 15, 16) are differentiated from the remaining populations
(after Müller-Starck 1995b). Differentiation of the western
populations was most evident at the locus SKDH-A encoding
shikimate dehydrogenase. In two of these populations the allele SKDH-A4
was at least seven times more frequent than in the remaining
populations. These findings are consistent with results from pollen
analyses indicating that Norway spruce stands in the west of
Switzerland may have a distinct origin or followed a separate
colonization route (C. Burga, unpublished).
Additional investigations are
being performed by studying variation in mitochondrial DNA. Analyses
of two intraspecific crosses indicated that mitochondrial DNA is
maternally inherited in Norway spruce (Mátyás et al.,
unpublished). Mutations of mitochondrial DNA arising in different
individuals are thus not recombined during sexual reproduction. This
together with the fact that mitochondrial DNA shows a low rate of
evolution in plants (Wolfe et al. 1987) suggests that
variation in mitochondrial DNA persists over many generations and
may show high levels of differentiation between populations. DNA
sequence analyses of a non-coding mitochondrial DNA fragment
indicated that there are at least three different mitochondrial DNA
types present in Switzerland (Sperisen et al., unpublished).
The spatial distribution of mitochondrial DNA variation will be
investigated and used to identify post-glacial migration routes.

|
1 Le Brassus, Risoud |
6 Saxeten |
11 Oberwald |
16 Bondo, Bosch Gras/Tens |
|
2 Chaux du Millieu |
7 Grindelwald, Itramenwald |
12 Faido |
17 Rona |
|
3 Orsières, Fôret de Branche |
8 Ried-Mörel, Aletschwald |
13 Muotathal, Bödmerenwald |
18 Conters |
|
4 Gstaad, Strählvorsass |
9 Simplon |
14 Brigels, Scatlè |
19 Poschiavo |
|
5 Adelboden |
10 Engslenalp |
15 San Bernardino |
20 Ardez, God Grond |
Fig. 1. Location of Norway spruce
populations investigated by isozyme analyses (Müller-Starck 1995b).
Shaded circles indicate populations selected for establishing gene
reserves (Bonfils et al. 1996).

Fig. 2. Hypothetical
gametic multilocus diversity (n gam) of 20 Norway spruce
populations in Switzerland (Müller-Starck 1995b). For locations of
populations investigated see Figure 1.
Current status of conservation activities
Gene reserves
Ten of the 20 populations
analyzed were selected for establishing gene reserves (Fig. 1) (Bonfils
et al. 1996). Populations showing high numbers of alleles and
high levels of heterozygosity and hypothetical gametic multilocus
diversity were selected. They included populations showing strong
differentiation and populations showing little differentiation.
Additional criteria for the selection of populations were their
autochthonous character, size, distribution within ecogeographical
regions and post-glacial migration routes.
For each of these potential
gene reserves contracts between the owners and the Swiss Forest
Agency are under negotiation (Table 2). These contracts include the
local name of the stand, the geographic location, a map of the area
covered, the ownership and forest management regulations. The
contracts will last 50 years. At the end of this duration they will
be extended for periods of 20 years. The gene reserves will be
incorporated in the general management plan of the forest owner. In
case of financial losses due to the special management of the gene
reserves the federal government and the cantons will compensate the
owners.
The gene reserves will be
under strict forest management regulations (Bonfils 1995).
Introduction of foreign genetic material is forbidden and natural
regeneration has to be used as far as possible to ensure
transmission of all genetic information to the subsequent tree
generation. The gene reserves are divided into four zones (zones 0 -
3); for each zone, management regulations are defined. In zone 0
selective thinnings are forbidden. This zone covers a relatively
small area (approx. 2 ha) but ensures a selection process close to
nature. Zone 1 represents the main part of the gene reserve. This
zone surrounds zone 0 and is 20-100 ha in size. Within this zone
traditional close-to-nature silviculture is performed to enhance
natural regeneration. If natural regeneration is not possible,
artificial regeneration has to rely on reproductive material from
the local provenance. A zone 2 is realized if trees of foreign
origin grow within the gene reserve. These trees have to be
eliminated at the end of the production period. Finally, zone 3 is a
buffer zone that prevents or reduces geneflow from trees of foreign
provenances to the gene reserve. For this zone, no particular
silvicultural regulations are defined.
Forest reserves
In addition to gene reserves,
Norway spruce is also preserved in five forest reserves covering a
total area of 400 ha. These forests are allowed to develop with
almost no human interference, leaving the trees to reach their
natural age and leaving dead wood in the forest. The forests serve
as nature reserves and research populations. The structure and
development of the forests are being analyzed and results from these
studies will be used to establish guidelines for close-to-nature
silviculture. Three of these forest reserves will be integrated in
the forest gene reserves.
Seed stands
Planting trees from distant
provenances may influence the patterns of genetic variation in
natural stands by pollen contamination. To obtain seeds of local
origin for plantations, a total of 384 Norway spruce stands were
selected as seed stands and registered according the OECD
regulations (Fürst, pers. comm.). These stands are distributed in
all ecogeographical regions of the country.
Table 2. List of designated gene
reserves with Norway spruce in Switzerland
|
Stand no. |
Location and name of forest |
Status of contract |
|
1 |
Le Brassus, Risoud |
accepted |
|
3 |
Orsières, Forêt de Branche |
under negotiation |
|
4 |
Gstaad, Strählvorsass |
under negotiation |
|
7 |
Grindelwald, Itramenwald |
in preparation |
|
8 |
Ried-Mörel, Aletschwald |
in preparation |
|
11 |
Oberwald |
in preparation |
|
13 |
Muotathal, Bödmerenwald |
under negotiation |
|
14 |
Brigels, Scatlè |
under negotiation |
|
16 |
Bondo, Bosch Gras/Tens |
in preparation |
|
20 |
Ardez, God Grond |
under negotiation |
Concluding remarks
The isozyme analyses performed
on 20 Norway spruce stands in Switzerland revealed significant
differences in intrapopulational and interpopulational variation.
These results together with information on the forest history, site
conditions and autochthonous origin of the stands were used as
criteria for selecting stands and their establishment as gene
reserves.
The results obtained indicated
that patterns of genetic variation we see in present Norway spruce
populations were influenced by post-glacial migration. Similar
results have been described for other plant and animal species
(Hewitt 1996). These analyses indicated that many plant and animal
species underwent divergent evolution in glacial refugia. Following
amelioration of the climate these refugial populations expanded and,
depending on the mode of migration and the route of migration taken,
gave rise to the present patterns of genetic variation. To conserve
as much genetic variation as possible, gene reserves should include
stands derived from different glacial refugia and stands along
distinct post-glacial migration routes.
Isozyme markers are likely to
describe only a part of the characteristics of a provenance. For
selecting stands for gene reserves it is therefore necessary to use
additional information such as the forest history, site conditions
and autochthony of stands. Several different types of DNA markers
are currently being developed for Norway spruce. They include
repetitive sequences of nuclear (Morgante et al. 1996) and
chloroplast DNA (Vendramin, pers. comm.) and non-coding sequences of
mitochondrial DNA (Sperisen et al. in preparation). Because
these markers contain DNA of the nuclear and organelle genomes, they
reveal different types of inheritance and different rates of
evolution and may thus give new insights into the history and
genetic structure of Norway spruce stands.
Conservation of genetic
variation may not only take place in gene reserves but also by
silvicultural practices applied to the total forest area. From a
genetic point of view these practices would aim at promoting
transmission of as much genetic variation as possible to the next
generation. Nursery practices would be ideally performed in a way
that no variation is lost from seed collecting to outplanting.
Variation in isozymes and DNA may provide useful markers for
studying genetic effects of these practices. For example, genetic
effects of different modes of seed collecting, culling of seedlings
in nurseries and outplanting of young trees could be analyzed. In
addition, natural and artificial regeneration could be compared in
juvenile stands. Results from such analyses could help to include
genetic aspects in silvicultural practices.
Our experience showed that an
active information policy and cooperation with the forest service is
of great importance for successful implementation of any kind of
gene conservation measures. In this sense establishment of gene
reserves contributes not only to the conservation of genetic
resources but also to the forest service's awareness of the forest
diversity.
Acknowledgements
We thank Silvia Fineschi and
Gerhard Müller-Starck for helpful discussions. We also thank Eliane
Escher for carrying out isozyme analyses, Urs Büchler, Gábor
Mátyás and Esther Jung for performing DNA analyses. The Swiss
programme "Conservation of forest genetic resources" is
financed by the Federal Office of Environment, Forests and Landscape
(BUWAL). Development of DNA markers is financed by the Federal
Office of Education and Sciences (BBW).
References
Bachofen, H., U.-B. Brändli, P. Brassel, H.
Kasper, P. Lüscher, F. Mahrer, W. Riegger, H.-R. Stierlin, T.
Strobel, R. Sutter, C. Wenger, K. Winzeler and A. Zingg. 1988.
Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Ergebnisse der Erstaufnahme
1982-1986. Ber. Eidgenöss. Anst. forstl. Vers.wes. 305.
Bonfils, P. 1995. Erhaltung genetischer Resourcen
im Wald. Genreservat Galm. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 146:295-303.
Bonfils, P., D. Schnyder and G. Müller-Starck.
1996. Vielfalt für die Zukunft: genetische Inventur der Fichte.
Argumente aus der Forschung. Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Schnee
Landsch. 12:13-23.
Brändli, U.-B. 1996. Die häufigsten Waldbäume
der Schweiz. Ergebnisse aus dem Landesforstinventar 1983-85:
Verbreitung, Standort und Häufigkeit von 30 Baumarten. Ber.
Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Schnee Landsch. 342.
Gregorius, H.-R. 1985. Measurement of genetic
differentiation in plant populations. Pp. 276-285 in
Population Genetics in Forestry (H.-R. Gregorius, ed.). Springer,
Heidelberg.
Gregorius, H.-R., J. Krauhausen and G.
Müller-Starck. 1986. Spatial and temporal genetic differentiation
among the seed in a stand of Fagus sylvatica L. Heredity
57:255-262.
Hewitt, G.M. 1996. Some genetic consequences of
ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J.
Linnean Soc. 58:247-276.
Huntley, B. and H.J.B. Birks. 1983. An Atlas of
Past and Present Pollen Maps for Europe: 0-13000 years ago, pp.
285-305. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leibundgut, H. 1984. Unsere Waldbäume. Huber,
Frauenfeld und Stuttgart:
Leibundgut, H. 1986. Unsere Gebirgswälder: Natur
- Zustand - Bewirtschaftung. Paul Haupt, Bern und Stuttgart.
Morgante, M., A. Pfeiffer, A. Costacurta and A.M.
Olivieri. 1996. Molecular tools for population and ecological
genetics in coniferous trees. Phyton-Annales Rei Botanicae
36:129-138.
Müller, U. 1990. Schutzwaldaufforstungen des
Staates Freiburg im Senseoberland. Forstpolitische Massnahmen des
Staates Freiburg seit 1850 am Beispiel der Schutzwaldaufforstungen
im Flyschgebiet des Senseoberlandes. Kantons-forstamt Freiburg:
108-131.
Müller-Starck, G. 1995a. Protection of genetic
variability in forest trees. Forest Genetics 2:121-124.
Müller-Starck, G. 1995b. Genetic variation in
high elevated populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.)
Karst.) in Switzerland. Silvae Genet. 44:356-362.
Müller-Starck, G., E. Hussendörfer and C.
Sperisen. 1995. Genetische Diversität bei Waldbäumen - eine
Voraussetzung für das Überleben unserer Wälder. In: Erhaltung der
Biodiversität - eine Aufgabe für Wissenschaft, Praxis und Politik.
Forum für Wissen. Ber. Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Schnee Landsch.:
23-32
OKOK Genreservate. 1988. Ein schweizerisches
Konzept für die Erhaltung der Erbsubstanz unserer Baumarten durch
die Schaffung von Genreservaten. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 139:313-322.
Scholz, F. and F. Bergmann. 1994. Genetic effects
of environmental pollution in tree populations. Pp. 34-50 in
Conservation and Manipulation of Genetic Resources in Forestry. Proc.
First Korean-German Symposium on Forest Genetics (Z.-S. Kim and H.H.
Hattemer, eds.). Korea University. Seoul, Kwang Moon Kag Publ. Comp.
Wolfe, K.H., W.H. Li and P.M. Sharp. 1987. Rates
of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial,
chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:9054-9058.
Contact EUFORGEN
Secretariat about this page
|