|
The conservation of Norway
spruce gene resources in the Federal Republic of Germany
Heino Wolf
Forestry Research Institute of
Saxony, D-01827 Graupa, Germany
Summary
In Germany, Norway spruce is
the most important timber tree and covers about 35% of the forest
area and about 60% of the total fellings in 1993. Beginning in the
eastern part of Germany in the 1960s and continuing in the western
part of Germany in the 1980s, severe damage of Norway spruce stands
caused by air pollution and forest decline could be observed.
Recording of these damages started in 1984. In 1994, Norway spruce
had the largest area damaged of all tree species because of its big
proportion of the total forest area. The heaviest damages could be
observed in the higher altitudes of the mountainous regions and the
Alps which are mainly part of the natural distribution area of
Norway spruce. Stands over 60 years old showed the worst damages. In
1985, the working party Conservation of Forest Gene Resources was
established to coordinate the efforts of federal and state
institutions concerning the conservation of forest gene resources.
Among other tree species, Norway spruce has the first priority.
Based on the conservation work already done by different
tree-breeding institutions, the working party developed a `Concept
on the Conservation of Forest Gene Resources in the Federal Republic
of Germany' in 1989. In the concept, several in situ and ex
situ measures were planned which should be realized within the
next decade. The conservation work done since 1989 was mainly
concentrated on the in situ conservation of Norway spruce
stands, the establishment of ex situ conservation stands, the
collection and storage of seeds and the vegetative propagation of
single trees. Finally, research needs and tasks were identified
related to the conservation activities planned.
The origin, natural
distribution and occurrence of Norway spruce forests
Origin of Norway spruce
forests
After the last ice age, Norway
spruce most probably remigrated into the area of today's Germany
from two refugial areas, the Balkan Peninsula and the Carpathian
Mountains. One of the main migration streams led obviously from the
Beskides over the Sudeten to the Ore Mountains which were reached
about 6500 BC. The other mainstream started in the refugial area on
the Balkan Peninsula, followed the edge of the eastern Alps, crossed
the river Danube, went west and northwest and came over the Bohemian
Forest to the Bavarian Forest in the southeast of Germany. Both
migration streams may have met in the Fichtelgebirge, the Frankonian
Forest and the Thuringian Forest. About 4000 BC, the Harz
Mountains were reached. The southern part of Germany was remigrated
by Norway spruce parallel to the northern edge of the Alps, coming
from the eastern parts of the Alps and finally reached the Black
Forest in 1500 BC (Fig. 1).
Natural distribution
In Germany, Norway spruce
occurs naturally in the mountainous and subalpine regions. Its
natural distribution area covers the Alps, the higher altitudes of
the Black Forest and of the Middle and East German Mountains. In the
natural forest societies, pure Norway spruce stands can be found on
extreme sites only, e.g. at the high mountainous and subalpine level
of the northern edge of the Alps, on cold, wet sites of the Black
Forest and the foothills of the Alps, and at the higher altitudes of
the Bavarian, Middle and East German mountainous areas. Apart from
these particular sites, Norway spruce normally contributes to mixed
beech, fir or pine forest societies in different percentages. In
total, Norway spruce is associated on about 25% of the natural
forest areas.
Fig. 1. Probable
remigration streams of Norway spruce in the Herzynic-Carpathian and
alpine distribution area (Proposal of F. Kral, 1976 in Schmidt-Vogt
1987) NOT AVAILABLE
Artificial
distribution and occurrence
In consequence of the thorough
devastation of the forests until the end of the 18th C and the
enormous timber demand in early industrial times, natural forests
were changed to artificial forests. Because of its wide ecological
range, fast growth rate and ability to cope with clear-cut
conditions, pure Norway spruce stands were promoted by forestry
apart from Scots pine. These led to an:
C increase of Norway
spruce up to 100% on sites on which Norway spruce was
represented only partly,
C extension
of Norway spruce on sites which were not suitable for Norway
spruce within the natural distribution area, and
C extension
on sites outside of the natural distribution area.
The promotion of Norway spruce
by forestry for two centuries was accompanied by the transfer of
reproductive material. In many cases, the origin of this material
was not known or not suitable in the long term. These facts make it
difficult to identify and delimit natural autochthonous Norway
spruce forests from nearly natural or artificial formations of
Norway spruce forests. Apart from these, Norway spruce showed good
yield and quality performance on very different site conditions
which favoured the planting of this species over a long period.
In 1993, about 30% of the
total land area of Germany was covered by forests, i.e. the forest
area added up to 10.7 million ha, and 3.8 million ha of the forest
area (35%) consisted of mainly pure Norway spruce stands. The
proportion of Norway spruce in the total fellings was about 60%,
i.e. 16.9 million m3. Today, Norway spruce is the most
important timber species in Germany.
Factors
threatening Norway spruce gene resources
In the past, the structures
and the character of natural forests in Germany were heavily
influenced by exploitation, deforestation, change of species
composition, etc. Since industrialization, forest decline caused by
air pollution influenced Norway spruce populations locally and
regionally. In the eastern part of Germany, the damage of Norway
spruce stands began in the 1960s and took dramatic dimensions,
especially in the Ore Mountains. In many cases, the locally adapted
populations disappeared within the shortest time. Since the
beginning of the 1980s, the damages caused by forest decline also
increased in western Germany. As opposed to the damages in eastern
Germany, these damages could only be related in single cases to a
certain emittent of air pollution.
Since 1984, the damages to the
forests have been ascertained and published in a yearly report in
the western part of Germany and since 1990 in the whole of Germany.
The results of visible damages of Norway spruce (loss of more than
25% of needles) show clear differences in the percentages and in the
development of the damages in the northwest, east and south of
Germany (Fig. 2). In 1994, the highest average damages could be
observed in the eastern part of Germany. Norway spruce stands in the
higher altitudes of the Thuringian Forests and the Ore Mountains
were particularly damaged. Norway spruce stands with more than 30%
of damaged trees could be found in the Alps, the Black Forest, the
northwestern Hessian Mountains and the southwestern part of
Schleswig-Holstein. The distribution of the damages on age classes
showed a clear difference between stands over 60 years and under 60
years of age (Table 1). Mixed stands were damaged as well as pure
stands.
In summary, Norway spruce has
the largest area damaged of all tree species because of its large
proportion of the total forest area. The heaviest damages were
observed in the higher altitudes of mountainous regions and the
Alps, which are part of the natural distribution area of Norway
spruce, where stands >60 years old had the worst damages.
In future, climate changes
caused by global warming could lead to a threat to Norway spruce
populations. However, the consequences are very difficult to
estimate. In particular, an increase in temperature connected with
higher evaporation and lower precipitation could result in higher
susceptibility to pests and diseases.
Fig. 2. Development
of visible damages (= loss of more than 25% of needles) on Norway
spruce, 1984-1994
Table 1. Development
of forest damages, 1984-1994, distributed on age classes
|
Year |
Percentage of Norway spruce trees with visible damages |
| |
Under 60 years |
Above 60 years |
Average |
|
1984 |
9 |
39 |
21 |
|
1985 |
11 |
45 |
24 |
|
1986 |
10 |
41 |
22 |
|
1987 |
7 |
34 |
17 |
|
1988 |
5 |
29 |
15 |
|
1989 |
4 |
29 |
14 |
|
1990 |
* |
* |
* |
|
1991 |
10 |
42 |
23 |
|
1992 |
11 |
44 |
24 |
|
1993 |
8 |
40 |
22 |
|
1994 |
9 |
42 |
24 |
* No figures available; since
1990, beginning of a new time series including the newly established
states after reunification.
Conservation aims and current
state of activities
History and organizational
structure of Norway spruce gene conservation
Because of its importance for
forestry, Norway spruce was one of the major species in
tree-breeding programmes. Following the Norway spruce provenance
trial of 1936/37 established by Rubner, Germany participated in the
2nd International IUFRO-Norway Spruce Provenance Trial of 1964/68
and in the International (IUFRO) Norway Spruce Provenance Trial of
1972. The conservation of populations and individuals of interest
was already part of the breeding programmes in the different
research institutions.
Because of the heavy damages
by air pollution in the German Democratic Republic, a special
programme for the conservation of Norway spruce was established in
1985. In the Federal Republic of Germany, the working party
`Conservation of Forest Gene Resources' was established in 1985
based on a resolution of the Bundesrat (upper house of the German
parliament) and an agreement among the Federal Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Forestry and the different State Ministries
responsible for Forestry. The working party is composed of appointed
representatives of the Federal Government and of the different state
governments. The task of the working party is the development of a
concept for the conservation of forest genetic resources and the
coordination of gene conservation activities. The implementation and
realization of gene conservation activities is the responsibility of
each state and its research institutions and forest services. After
the reunification of Germany, the new estabilished states joined the
working party.
Objectives and measures of
Norway spruce gene conservation
The general objective of
forest gene conservation is to conserve and save the genetic
variation of tree and shrub species in the following generations. In
the medium term, in situ conservation of Norway spruce stands
and their natural or artificial regeneration by sowing or planting
will not be possible in many regions owing to the continuing air
pollution. Consequently, ex situ measures will be of great
importance, e.g. the establishment of seed orchards and clone
collections, the storage of seeds or parts of plants, and vegetative
propagation. The following remarks are based on the concept of the
working party Conservation of Forest Gene Resources which was
published in 1989 before the reunification of Germany in 1990. The
figures mentioned below for the planned conservation measures were
extrapolated to consider also the Norway spruce forests of the five
newly established states of Germany.
It is planned to cover about
1% of the Norway spruce area, i.e. about 38 000 ha, with
conservation measures within the next decade beginning in 1989. From
this area, 80%, i.e. 30 800 ha, will be conserved in situ.
It is assumed that it will not be possible to conserve the remaining
20% in situ owing to the increase of forest decline. For
these 7200 ha, ex situ measures will be used. To minimize the
risk of loss, it is planned to take double ex situ measures
for about 3100 ha of the in situ area. Norway spruce stands
which should be conserved by sowing or planting, i.e. 15 200 ha,
will also be conserved by storage of seeds.
In situ measures
In total, 30 800 ha of Norway
spruce stands will be conserved in situ. The soil of 75% of
these stands should be improved by application of lime. The vitality
of all in situ stands should be increased by regular stand
maintenance, thinning and fertilizing. The change in vitality has to
be monitored by regular analysis of the soil and the needles. The
results of the analysis will be used as a decision-making aid for
future management.
On condition of the
fructification being sufficient and the soil conditions still
suitable, about 300 ha/year of Norway spruce stands have to be
regenerated naturally, after having reached a suitable age. The
natural regeneration is promoted by specific silvicultural
management, e.g. by fertilizing. Additionally, about 300 ha/year
should be regenerated artificially using material from stands worth
conserving.
Ex situ measures
About 10 300 ha of Norway
spruce stands are to be conserved by ex situ measures;
3100 ha out of these are included in double measures. This area
should be conserved representatively on an area of about 1000 ha.
The establishment of seed orchards will be one priority of the ex
situ conservation.
Especially in the higher
altitudes of the mountainous and subalpine regions, various Norway
spruce populations have already disappeared. Some of these
populations are part of different national and international
provenance trials or conserved in clone collections established for
breeding purposes. This material can be used to assemble clones in
collections or seed orchards.
In the first decade, about
6000 trees should be selected from the 7200 ha to be conserved ex
situ. These 6000 trees have to be conserved representatively on
an area of 600 ha. Additionally, clone collections should be
established for the conservation of endangered relict populations
and single trees which represent rare genotypes or material
important for breeding. For this, 1000 clones can be estimated, thus
requiring an additional area of 20 ha.
It is planned to conserve
about 13 200 ha of Norway spruce stands by sowing and planting in
situ and ex situ. Together with the procurement of seeds
for these measures, seeds for storage purposes have to be collected.
In Germany, seed collection of Norway spruce is possible every 3
years on average. In the first decade, about 12 000 ha of
Norway spruce stands should be collected with 4 kg seeds per stand.
As an additional conservation
measure, pollen of about 5000 selected breeding trees has to be
collected and stored. In the first decade, the storage of plants or
parts of plants is not planned for. It is much more effective to
store seeds. If starting material is limited and cannot be
propagated in a different way, macrovegetative propagation is used.
For this purpose, about 6000 clones with an additional area of 10 ha
will be needed. The microvegetative propagation using tissue culture
is not developed yet. But this method is of special interest for the
conservation of old trees which are difficult to propagate by
cuttings or grafting.
The current state of
activities
Among other species, the
conservation of Norway spruce gene resources has the highest
priority. Because of the different levels of damages, regional
priorities have to be set. Generally, the conservation measures are
mainly concentrated on Norway spruce stands which are approved
according to the federal law on forest reproductive material. In
1993, 44 466.2 ha of Norway spruce stands were approved for the
production of selected reproductive material. About 62% of these
stands were the property of the states. The remaining stands were
mainly distributed between private (19%) and corporate owners (18%).
Only a marginal percentage belonged to the Federal Republic of
Germany (1%).
Additionally, several in
situ and ex situ measures were taken to conserve Norway
spruce gene information until the end of 1993. The emphasis was laid
on in situ conservation of Norway spruce stands, the
establishment of ex situ conservation stands, the collection
and storage of seeds and the vegetative propagation of single trees
by cuttings (Tables 2, 3 and 4). Activities in 1994 and ongoing
activities in 1995 will be published in the next report of the
working party Conservation of Forest Gene Resources at the end of
1995.
Table 2. Conservation
activities in the field
|
Activity |
Up to 1991 |
1992/93 |
|
In situ |
|
|
|
Stands
Number
Area (ha) |
49
61.7 |
14
33.9 |
|
Ex situ |
|
|
|
Stands
Number
Area (ha) |
426
359.1 |
40
71.3 |
|
Seed orchards/clone collection
Number
Area (ha) |
33
80.8 |
1
2.4 |
Research activities and needs
In the past, research
activities in forestry were mainly concentrated on the growth and
yield of forest stands, silvicultural measures and genetic
characterization of populations by provenance and progeny trials.
Because of the extent of the forest decline, research was started on
forest ecosystems but focused mainly on biogeochemical and energy
cycles. On the other hand, a certain lack of knowledge could be
observed in the field of gene conservation. Normally, measures
should be based on scientific results, but gene conservation
measures had to be established immediately to avoid the loss of a
significant amount of genetic information. In this case, research
should accompany the measures of gene conservation.
The research activities and
needs can be divided into two categories, the research on practical
gene conservation measures and the research on specific problems
which are related to the necessary methods of gene
conservation.
Table 3. Collection
and storage of conservation material
|
Activity |
Up to 1991 |
1992/93 |
|
Seed collection |
|
|
|
Stands
Number
Amount (kg) |
277
1068.5 |
37
910.2 |
|
Trees
Number
Amount (kg) |
2435
288.6 |
206
C |
|
Seed storage |
|
|
|
Stands
Number
Amount (kg) |
322
735.1 |
70
714.8 |
|
Trees
Number
Amount (kg) |
2412
285.1 |
97
4.4 |
|
Pollen storage |
|
|
|
Number
ccm |
384
4561.7 |
C
C |
Table 4. Propagation
for conservation
|
Activity |
Up to 1991 |
1992/93 |
|
Number of graftings |
24 315 |
C |
|
Number of cuttings |
1 536 830 |
250 000 |
|
Sowings |
|
|
|
Stands
Number
Amount (kg) |
3
10.5 |
1
1.5 |
|
Trees
Number
Amount (kg) |
204
1.0 |
1019
2.4 |
The latter includes research
on the influence of air pollution on the genetic structure of
populations and reproductive mechanism, methods to identify and
evaluate genetic variation as well as mechanisms and parameters of
resistance.
The research about gene
conservation measures related to Norway spruce covers all aspects of
in situ and ex situ measures:
1. Conservation of stands
and natural regeneration
In most federal states,
several projects are already established. Nevertheless, there
are still problems in getting and maintaining natural
regeneration in stands thinned out and revitalizing damaged
stands.
2. Artificial regeneration
in situ and ex situ and management of seed
orchards
In this field, different
main problems can be identified: the influence and promotion of
mycorrhiza on ex situ measures, planting techniques in
higher altitudes; management methods of seedling seed orchards
with regard to selection, regulation of space and
fructification, the stimulation of flowering and the increase of
seed production.
3. Storage of pollen,
plants and parts of plants
In the past, the
collection, preparation and storage of pollen was mainly done
for tree-breeding purposes. For gene-conservation measures, the
techniques of collection and storage of large amounts of pollen
have to be improved. The storage of parts of plants (e.g.
cuttings) is only possible in the short term, but the storage of
tissues is not possible at all. Research is necessary on the
conditions of long-term storage of plants, parts of plants
(twigs, buds) and tissues, their survival and regeneration
abilities.
4. Vegetative propagation
The vegetative propagation
of Norway spruce by cuttings and graftings is well established.
The rejuvenilization of vegetative material collected from old
trees is still difficult. The vegetative propagation by tissue
cultures was possible only in single cases. The development of
procedures for the microvegetative propagation seems necessary.
On the other hand, there are similar problems with the
rejuvenilization of material using tissue cultures.
Facing the climatic change
caused by global warming, investigations seem to be overdue on the
relationship between the genetic diversity observed and the
adaptability of populations, on the influence of silvicultural
measures on the genetic structure of populations and on the
mechanism generating the variability observed into phenotypic
adaptive traits.
Further reading
Braun, H., M. Weiss
and N. Kohlstock. 1985. Erhaltung des genetischen Potentials der
Fichte (Picea excelsa). Sozialistische Forstwirtschaft
37:149-152.
Bundesrat. 1985.
Entschließung des Bundesrates über Maßnahmen zur Erhaltung der
genetischen Vielfalt der Waldbaumarten [Resolution of the Bundesrat
according to conservation of genetic diversity of forest tree
species]. Paper 573/84.
Evaluation and
Information Service for Food, Agriculture and Forestry. 1994.
Forst-Holz 1994 [Forestry-Wood Industries 1994]. Evaluation and
Information Service for Food, Agriculture and Forestry, Bonn, 16 pp.
Federal Ministry of
Food, Agriculture and Forestry. 1994. List of approved basic
material for forest reproductive material in the Federal Republic of
Germany (Status: 01. October 1993). Federal Ministry of Food,
Agriculture and Forestry, Bonn, 381 pp.
Federal Ministry of
Food, Agriculture and Forestry. 1995. Waldzustandsbericht der
Bundesregierung 1994 [Report of the Federal Government on the
condition of forests]. Publications of the Federal Ministry of Food,
Agriculture and Forestry, Issue 440, Bonn, 99 pp.
Mayer, H. 1980.
Waldbau [Silviculture]. Gustav Fischer Publishers, Stuttgart, New
York, 2nd edition, 483 pp.
Schmidt, P. (in
press). Übersicht der natürlichen Waldgesellschaften Deutschlands
[Survey on the natural forest societies of Germany].
Schmidt-Vogt, H. 1987.
Die Fichte, Band 1 [Norway spruce, 1st issue]. Parey Publishers,
Hamburg, Berlin, 2nd edition, 647 pp.
Schober, R. 1988.
Einfluß der Provenienz auf die Ertragsleistung [Influence of the
provenance on the yield]. In Waldwachstumslehre [Science of
forest growth and yield] (H. Kramer, ed.). Parey Publishers,
Hamburg, Berlin, 374 pp.
Working Party
`Conservation of Forest Gene Resources'. 1989. Konzept zur Erhaltung
forstlicher Genressourcen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Concept
on the conservation of forest gene resources in the Federal Republic
of Germany]. Forst und Holz 44:379-404.
Working Party
`Conservation of Forest Gene Resources'. 1994. Tätigkeitsbericht
der Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe `Erhaltung Forstlicher Genressourcen'
Berichtszeitraum 1992-1993. [Activities report of the working party
`Conservation of Forest Gene Resources', Report period 1992-1993].
Forest Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Department of Tree
Breeding, 29 pp. and Annex.
Contact EUFORGEN
Secretariat about this page
|