Bean seeds tested for viability at the CIAT genebank. CIAT
| Availability |
“The Centre undertakes to make samples of the designated germplasm and related information
available directly to users or through FAO, for the purpose of scientific research, plant breeding or genetic
resources conservation, without restriction.”
|
| System-wide |
|
The System-Wide Genetic Resources Programme of the CGIAR (SGRP) was established in large measure
to ensure the ability of the Centres to meet their obligations under the agreements with FAO. SGRP has forged a system
that unites the Centre in-trust collections through common policies and collaboration and shared protocols for the
acquisition and dissemination of germplasm and the information associated with it. Anyone with access to the internet
can use SINGER, the SGRP’s information network, to uncover a mass of valuable information derived from the complete
database of the Centres’ in-trust collections.
|

www.sgrp.cgiar.org
www.singer.cgiar.org
SGRP Secretariat
International Plant Genetic resources
Institute
Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a
00057 Maccarese
(Fiumicino)
Rome, Italy
Tel: (+39) 0661181
Fax: (+39) 0661979661
Email:
sgrp-secretariat@cgiar.org
The system-Wide Genetic Resources Programme
was established in 1994 to strengthen the CGIAR's ability to contribute to global genetic resources efforts.

|
The CGIAR system holds the largest international collection of genetic resources in the world, making up approximately
40% of the unique samples of the world’s major food crops.
Eleven of the 16 Future Harvest Centres have ex-situ collections of in-trust materials. Between them they hold more than
half a million samples of crops, forages and agroforestry species.
This material has been gathered in the course of about 2000 collecting missions in 150 countries and as a received
through exchanges with other collections. About three-quarters of the samples are traditional varieties and landraces
and wild and weedy relatives. This material contains huge reserves of diversity, which makes it particularly valuable
for future crop improvement.
Background to access
Most of the world’s genebanks were founded in a climate of free exchange of material. The 1983 International
Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources upheld this ideal, stating that germplasm was a “common heritage of
mankind” and should be freely available to all without restriction.
The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), signed in Rio in 1992, recognized national sovereignty over the
genetic resources found within a country’s borders. The CBD encourages countries to give others access to
genetic resources, with prior consent on agreed terms for sharing any benefits that may accrue. Access as
envisaged by the CBD could be structured along bilateral or multilateral lines. The Future Harvest Centres
believe strongly that—for the species they are concerned with—multi-lateral agreements are preferable.
Resolution Three of the Nairobi Final Act of the Conference for the Adoption of the Agreed Text of the
Convention on Biological Diversity reinforces this interpetation. It recognized that ex-situ material collected
before 1993 constituted a subset of genetic resources that merited special consideration. The agreements
between Centres and FAO to clarify the status of this ex-situ material explicitly state that they should be
interpeted as being in harmony with the CBD and the International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources.
Agreements with FAO
The interim agreements (pending revision of the International Undertaking) were signed on 26 October 1994, and
essentially guarantee that materials remain freely available. The Centres claim no intellectual property rights
over the material they hold in trust, and no-one who uses that material can restrict access to it. The
agreements assure governments that the Centres will maintain the designated collections in trust.
Materials acquired after the CBD came into force are subject to the terms agreed between the Centre and the
supplier of the resources. The Centres have striven to obtain such material on the same terms as samples
already held in their genebanks.
How much
The Centres send out about 150,000 samples each year from the in-trust collections, mostly to research
establishments in developing countries. National genebanks that have lost their collections through war or
natural disasters have been able to call on the in-trust collections, even re-introducing material back into
the farming communities to help re-establish their agricultural base. In-trust collections also function to
insure against other forms of loss. In recent years about 45 countries have asked for samples of germplasm that
they originally provided to the Future Harvest genebanks.
Scores of beans were grown from In-trust collections for the Seeds of Hope programme,
returning local varieties to Rwanda after the civil war. William Scowcroft
|